History of theMalay Kingdom of Patani by Ibrahim Syukri.
Silkworm Books, Chiang Mai; 2005. P115.
Few copies survived, but an English translation was published in 1985 by the Centre for International Studies at Ohio University, and now, for the first time, in Thailandby Chiang Mai’s Silkworm Books. No one knows who Ibrahim Syukri was, though it is obviously a pseudonym. But, as historian David Wyatt points out in his newly-written introduction to the book, we can tell that he clearly was a native of Patani, well-educated in the local traditions and culture. It is also apparent that the author had obtained a degree of Western-style learning, even including some knowledge of English (which he would have had great difficulty obtaining in the Patani region.) Whatever the identity of the author, and despite the fact that he wrote the book half-a-century ago, this outline of Patani’s history should be compulsory reading for anyone interested in establishing peace in Thailand’s troubled south. It is important not because it is an objective historical study, which it is not, but because it reflects the way in which many, if not most, southern Muslims perceive past and present injustices against their community. “The sovereignty of the Malay rulers of Patani was abolished through trickery by the Siamese kingdom in 1902 [and] its Patani Malay subjects were changed to citizens of the state of Siam-Thai,” the author writes. Even Western historians would argue that Patani ended up on the wrong side of the border because of historical convenience. In 1909, the British and the Thais signed a treaty, which marked the formal transfer of authority to Bangkok in return for the abandoning of Thai claims to the Malay states of Kedah, Perlis and Kelantan. The territorial dispute between Thailand and the British colonial power in Malaya was solved, but the new border caused an internal conflict in Thailand that continues to this day. In December 1947, the Thai police burned the village of Kampung Belukar Masahak and arrested scores of young Muslims in retaliation for the killing of a Thai official in the area. Ibrahim Syukri quotes an article that appeared in the Singapore Straits Times shortly afterwards, in which the reporter, Barbara Wittingham-Jones, stated that “although the Thai-Siam have oppressed the Patani Muslims so terribly for 50 years, nevertheless the principle of Siamizing the Malays in Patani has not yet succeeded.” Little has changed since then, but it is Thailand’s strength that a book like this can now be published in the country. And that could be the beginning of a meaningful discussion about the roots of the problem in the South and what the way forward should be. |
Responses
0 Respones to "BOOK REVIEW: KINGDOM OF CONFLICT"
Post a Comment