By Abu Hafez Al-Hakim | Mon, 2013-11-04 15:51
(Translated from a Malay article : Surat terbuka kepada media Thai )
Read Malay Text : http://www.deepsouthwatch.org/ms/node/4909
Labels:
Human Right,
Politic
(Translated from a Malay article : Surat terbuka kepada media Thai )
Read Malay Text : http://www.deepsouthwatch.org/ms/node/4909
Greetings
The major
influence a media has in a society is undeniable. Its role is not just to
deliver news and information to the public but also to influence the views or
attitude of the society, through reporting and writing. Thus journalists are
considered to be agents of change in a society.
In the
context of political conflict in the South (Patani) the main-stream Thai media
has long been responsible for propagation of news and information . We,
the freedom fighters of Patani, view the general opinion and
the way information and news being disseminated by Thai
media and journalists as outdated . In spite of the rapid
progress in the field of information technology nothing much has changed .
The Thai media HAS NEVER or RARELY been fair to the Patani freedom
movements in its reports. Since 50 years or so until now the situation
has not improved.
In the
Thai media, Patani freedom fighters are often negatively
portrait as "Southern Villains or Terrorists " .
This attitude reflects extreme prejudice and biased reporting. What is
the justification to label persons who fight for the rights of their own
people as such, only because they violently oppose Thai suppression ? If
that is the case, King Naresuan and the King Taksin could also be called
terrorists because they also rose up ,using violence, against the Burmese
occupation of Ayutthaya
in the past.
When the
late Tuan Guru Haji Sulong submitted his infamous 7 petitions in 1953 , not
only was he arrested and imprisoned on “revolt” charge , but
was also eventually murdered . Against whom did he revolt ? Was his
intention to topple the regime in Bangkok
or just simply to demand rights and justice for the Malay Muslims
in the South? This unjust Label remains until today and
continues to be propagated by certain media in Thailand , disregarding the
sensitivity of the people of Patani Muslims who revere him as a great
‘Ulama’( religious scholar).
The
freedom fighters groups are also called "Separatist
Movements ". It is important to stress here that
all Patani freedom fighters groups are
LIBERATION MOVEMENTS, not SEPARATISTS. By political
science definition there is a great
difference between a liberation movement and a separatist movement. All
those labels or terms were intentionally created
by the Thai Government to paint negative picture of the fighters.
Unfortunately, the Thai media blindly adopted the label without
profound consideration nor objective research of the fighters'
true intention , thus putting them in a disadvantage position in the eyes of
Thai general public and world community.
The main
principle of journalism states that : "The main task of a journalist is
to report the truth and to respect the rights of people to obtain the correct
information." Apparently in the context of Patani reporting , it
is not so. Thai journalists are often seen tagging the
security forces , or government personnel to a location for news
coverage. This is sufficient for general public to view them as "government
people" and therefore become uncooperative and denied them
vital and accurate information they badly need. With language
barrier , unprofessional attitude and laziness , they
are easily satisfied with the "second-hand" information
readily provided and “spoon-fed “ by the security forces. Thus
many news reports are seen concluding typically in a “stereotype “ manner :
the authorities are still investigating the incident, believed to be
carried out by the Southern terrorists from the area.
Perhaps
they have forgotten about this another principle: To seek out and
disseminate competing perspectives without being unduly influenced by those who
would use their power or position counter to the public interest, that
is to find and present different views without being influenced by
those who abuse power or office contrary to the interest of people in
this area. In carrying out his duties, a journalist believes in freedom to
gather information and publish his reports honestly and reserves the right to make
fair reviews and criticism.
Thai
media also rarely provides space and opportunity for
the freedom fighters to voice their opinion or to
communicate with the general public throughout Thailand, to address
some important issues . Perhaps they would be thinking : why
must they give space and coverage to villains and terrorists ?
Until now the general Thai public are still wondering : Why are the
Malays in the South resisting the Government? Why
resort to violence ? Why do they want to secede from Thailand ?
Why are there bomb explosions everywhere, involving not only the armed forces
but also the public lives and properties ? Why are teachers being
targeted ? ...and so on.
Another
important Principle of Journalism is “To give voice to the voiceless;
document the unseen” . It urges the media to open space and
opportunity for those who are oppressed to highlight and make their voice
heard. The Thai media is expected to document things that are
intentionally “hidden” by the authorities , so that the truth will
be investigated and exposed . Otherwise the Thai general public will
forever be denied true information and the Malay Patani
people , particularly the freedom fighters, will continue to
be regarded as villains, rebels or worse as terrorists, while in reality
they struggle to restore their deprived rights.
The
situation is however different with foreign journalists and media. They are
very professional, with a proactive approach and produce unbiased reports. They
do not expect information to be fed, but work hard to extract
information by adopting the "Engaging the community" approach.
Though they also face constraints of language and culture like their Thai
counterparts, but the professionalism and ethics they strongly adhere to in
journalism, provides them easy access to information from reliable
and original source (authentic). The Patani Malays , especially
villagers, are more comfortable with foreign journalists compared to Thai
journalists.
That's
why we find news reports and information posted by foreign
media are much better and more trustworthy compared to the Thai media.
Sometimes there are great differences of facts and information between both or
even contradicting to those reported in the Thai media. A considerable
number of people throughout the world, as well as over 300 millions of Malays
of the Nusantara now have a better understanding of Patani people's
suffering, plight and their struggle , in comparison to 60
million Thai people who have yet to understand the true nature of the conflict
in the South.
Another
important issue in Thai media reporting is HISTORICAL FACTS. In the
context of the history of Patani, beginning from the era of Langkasuka
Empire to the present day, Thai media are more likely to adhere
fanatically to the historical version that is written by their own people
. The position and relationship of nation-states in the past,
particularly the Patani-Siamese political conflict, is only seen from the
Thai historical point of view. This resulted in wrong assumption that Patani
and the Northern States
of Malaysia (Kelantan,
Kedah, Terengganu and Perlis) were initially owned by Siam . Thai
history claims that some territories that are now part of the neighboring
countries such as Laos , Malaysia , Khmer and Myanmar were originally theirs. On
the contrary if we refer to the histories of the countries involved we
will find that they also claim that all the mentioned areas were historically
theirs but subjected to Thai domination and expansion during certain
periods.
If we
study the records written by foreign historians and travelers who had had
contact with Patani in the past such as the Chinese, the Japanese, the
Dutch, the Portuguese, the English and the Arabs, we will discover detailed
records that are very much different to the ones written by the Thais. These
facts are often ignored and overlooked by Thai media.
Thai
media has always labeled the Patani freedom fighter as bandits, villains,
separatists, rebels or terrorists . Since the Patani Malays did not
have proper channels to voice their opinions, the feelings of dissatisfaction
remained unheard for years. Ironically, when the Patani freedom fighters call
the Thais “PENJAJAH” (colonialist), they turn surprised
and angry . Then we find the Thai media begin to exploit the issue
in their news reports, adding more fuel to the fire. They find it
hard to accept the fact that they were also a " colonial"
power, or conquerer in the region. The history of the people
in the Malay world of Nusantara has, without doubt, regarded Siam as one of
the colonialist along-side with the European powers of the previous
centuries.
The
Kuala Lumpur
peace initiative through the General Consensus on
Peace Dialogue Process dated 28 February 2013 gave a new
and acceptable recognition to the fighters. They are no longer considered as
villains nor terrorists but as "people who have different opinion
and ideologies from the (Thai) State " Almost all of
the world's leading foreign media pay serious attention and are optimistic for
the success of the process towards peace. Some Thai media ,on the other
hand, not only turn a cold shoulder to the peace process, disregarding
their own government's effort for a peaceful solution, posing a lot of
questions discrediting the process , they go as far as turning
themselves into a bunch of anti-peace group, or peace spoilers. If they
do not want this conflict be settled by peaceful means, are there any other
alternatives ? Or does the Thai media share the same sentiment with
certain parties who prefer to see the situation as status quo, where unrest and
instability rules the day, resulting in countless casualties in lives and
properties ? This is similar to the attitude of certain people, the opponent of
peace ,who will lose influence and material gains from certain unlawful
dealings in the event of peace. Is that their hidden agenda ?
Lately
,we find a small number of Thai journalists and media start opening
their eyes and make an effort to seek the truth to present
the general public. They no longer rely on biased " script" dictated
to them by the authorities. They are independent , hard working, doing research
and thorough investigation, at the same time engaging the community of
different language, race and culture. What they get in return is people's trust
who are ready to open their hearts for them, providing whatever
information deemed necessary. For that reason we can now read several
different reports from them ,including some video documentaries, about certain
important events such as the "Tak Bai Tragedy" (rewritten)
report, the death of Mat Rosol, the stand-off involving
Ustaz Rahim or " Black Pele", and the latest shooting
incidence at Paku, Thung Yang Deng District . All those writings
create an alternative perspective and balanced news presentation and
narratives for reporting in the South. Through this the voice and views
of the fighters are heard. Unfortunately these journalists are cynically
referred to as the "voice" of BRN.
Indeed,
there is no other option for Thai media and journalists other than making
a "Paradigm Shift" in their reporting career , uphold The
Universal Principles of Journalism and the Guiding Principles for Journalists,
without fear or favour. That is the only way people's voice will be heard
, the truth will prevail ,and justice will be served. The Thai
media and journalists will be respected for being trustworthy and
reliable , not only by the local community, but the general public throughout Thailand and
the world.
With
regards.
Vinegar
and Honey - from
outside the fence of Patani
Muharram/November
2013
Responses
0 Respones to "An open letter to Thai media"
Post a Comment